in

‘Lacking any real creativity’ – what the papers said about Chelsea’s loss at Newcastle

The Independent

“Chelsea’s away form has been largely impressive of late, with most of their struggles coming at Stamford Bridge. But they were surprisingly lacklustre here, lacking any real cutting edge or creativity,” writes Callum Rice-Coates for the Independent.

“Tammy Abraham was unusually wasteful, while Willian and Callum Hudson-Odoi were mostly ineffective.

“Chelsea were rarely at their fluid best here, but the performance of young right back Reece James will have pleased Frank Lampard. The 20-year-old impressed against Burnley last week, too, and already looks an accomplished attacking full back.

Video Loading

Video Unavailable

Click to play
Tap to play

The video will start in8Cancel

Play now

“His marauding forward runs and clever interplay caused Newcastle constant problems.”

Daily Mail

“They passed and probed and passed some more, but for all of their huff and puff Chelsea never looked like blowing Newcastle away, ” writes Craig Hope for the Mail on Sunday.

“In the end – the 94th minute, no less – it was they who had the wind knocked from them with a sucker-punch that served as punishment for such a ponderous performance.

“Isaac Hayden was the match-winner as he headed in from an attack that counted as the hosts’ first of a second half in which they had shown little desire to leave their own penalty area.

Dejected Chelsea players after conceding at St. James Park (Image: Robbie Jay Barratt – AMA/Getty Images)
(Image: Robbie Jay Barratt – AMA/Getty Images)

“Yes, Chelsea dominated, but Newcastle were more than happy to watch them do so. In truth, this is the only way they know how, yet repeatedly they have found a way to win matches in which the statistics would tell us they had no right to do so.”

Read More
Related Articles
Read More
Related Articles

The Telegraph

“Chelsea did not have time to respond, they were beaten and could not understand any of what had just happened,” writes Luke Edwards for the Telegraph. They…

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0

Comments

0 comments